Smaller parties 'gaining ground'

For all nationalist out there reading this blog - please read the story below and then think about your strategies for the General Election, as I have said before we all need to work together because for the first time in history Nationailst Parties have a chance of winning seats. BUT we all have to work together as I said in my previous post. The traditional assumption that support for political parties other than the main three disappears at a general election has been challenged by private polling seen by the BBC. And just ahead of their party conference, the research suggests that support for the Conservatives in some of their target seats has fallen slightly in the last year. The number of voters in marginal seats who said they would vote Labour instead has also stalled. But the striking change suggested by the data is the rise in the number of people who told pollsters they would vote for parties other than the big three. Marginal seats The polling was carried out by one time Conservative strategist Lynton Crosby, who spearheaded Michael Howard's general election campaign in 2005. It suggests that 44% of voters in key marginal seats like Crawley and Hove in the south of England would vote Tory at a general election - down from 48% last year. Support for Labour is languishing at 20%, while the Lib Dems are down from 21% to 18%. But support for "others" - UKIP, the Green Party, the BNP and other small parties - has doubled, from 9% to 18%. The polling suggests a surge in support for UKIP, in particular. In summer 2008, just 1% of people in marginal seats said they would back the party at a general election. Now that figure has risen to 6%. The Greens have seen a smaller increase, from 4% to 6% while the BNP rating has gone up by just one point, from 2% to 3%. The increase in support for the lesser-known parties has come at a cost to all of the major ones, the research suggests. But the Tories may be most worried about the downward shift as it suggests they have been just as badly affected by the public's anger over the expenses scandal as Labour - if not more so. The research, which was carried out in July for the pressure group Flying Matters, also reveals that the drop in Labour's support matches almost directly the switch of the party's leader from Blair to Brown. But it also suggests that about a quarter of people's allegiances are "soft", meaning they are yet to make up their minds. Worries about jobs, not surprisingly, have gone up the list of voters' concerns. Healthcare and crime were the second and third most important priorities, while concerns about the environment have become less of an issue in voters' minds. It is, of course, only one piece of polling, and it would be dangerous to translate it into solid conclusions. But it does give a rare glimpse of political shifts in the places around the country where the next general election will be decided.

Radio Station live 4th October 6pm onwards Sunday

• 6.00pm Nationalist News
• 6.10pm Rock Show with The Drewmeister - from Wales all the latest in Hard Rock and Heavy Metal, this is loud and vey heavy - YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED
• 7.00pm Nationalist News
• 7.10pm Rock n Roll show - Biggles takes you thru the years with topical conversation and news.
• 8.00pm Nationalist News
• 8.10pm V for Vendetta - Vendetta tells you as it is with dedications and classic rock and  pop music.
• 9.00pm Nationalist News
• 9.10pm Letter to Britain by The Beacon followed by extended interviews with the leading lights of the English Democrats     including the Chairman Robin Tilbrook and Doncaster Mayor Peter Davies and topical Conversation.
• 10.00pm Nationalist News
• 10.10pm Speech by a Leading Nationalist followed by conversation and music.
• 11.00pm Nationalist News followed by National Anthem and Close

Please feel free to email us at:
rfb-comments@ntlworld.com - with your views
rfb-requests@ntlworld.com - with your music requests
rfb-press@ntlworld.com - if you have news or events that you would like us to mention

Websites carrying the radio

http://radiofreebritain.blogspot.com
http://bedfordshirebeacon.blogspot.com
http://nationalismwithoutracism.blogspot.com
http://bugsinbeds.blogspot.com
http://http://northantspatriot.blogspot.com

Collaborate or Lose

Below is a post by my friend and True Patriot the Beacon, all Nationalist should read this message very carefully and think about it. I have been saying for a long time now that our situation a Nationalists is very similar to that of the Communists in 1920's/30's Germany when they saw the threat of the National Socialists led by Adolf Hitler, instead of banding together early in the game they were fragmented which basically left Germans with no one to vote for but Adolf Hitler, while we absolutely despise the communists we can take a very valuable lesson from 80 years ago. We must stop being talk shops and hiding in our own little groups complaining but doing nothing, we must band together in an alliance and , like the Beacon says we must put aside party differences and petty arguments and make sure there is a strong Nationalist candidate in each seat and all nationalist need to get behind that candidate. IF WE DON'T DO THIS THEN REMEMBER WHAT HAPPENED TO THOSE IN OPPOSITION 80 YEARS AGO IN GERMANY.

Biggles

British Nationalism

It looks more and more as April 2010 will be the date set for the general election. Labour can't afford to go in June taking the gamble they will prosper in the council elections to lead them to victory in the general. If they get a thrashing in May, and there is little evidence to show they won't, it will have to be April or May at best.

One slight worry is the nonsense being spun about a general election may spark riots. It has been suggested Brown may use that lie in order to declare a national emergency to postpone a general election. Conspiracy theory? Maybe.

The Nationalists in England are winning the argument and are definitely on the rise. We have to take our stand at this election for our own good. That means we have to stop party politics and petty arguments and support the Nationalist candidate regardless which party they stand for.

I'm not saying you have to give up your allegiance to your own party, you don't. What I am saying is give all the support you can to the Nationalist local to you. We have to use tactical measures to suit our cause.

This is not 1979 and Cameron is no Thatcher! We can take seats in Westminster if we really want to by concentrating on those who can win regardless which flag they fly under. In the end we all fly British flags be they Union or English.

I'm sure this plea of consolidation and co-operation will fall of deaf ears. Until those who call themselves nationalists put nationalism before party, we will continue to be kept put in the cold.

Beacon

EDL Promo

Just a little info for you all

And finally from my Scottish Friend a piece of brilliance

This is something which was almost, but after a bit of discussion and thought, not posted to Scottish Unionist's thread onSuppressed anti-Englishness.

Clearly it doesn't belong there, because that's turned into a serious and lengthy discussion, while this is just a bit of tongue-in-cheek hooliganism. Nonetheless, it does illustrate some of SU's points about the fairly unique nature of British national identity.

This isn't new - you'll have seen it knocking around before - but I've added a Scotland-specific coda.

For those who are offended all I'd like to say is: Hee!

"European Terror Alert Status Update

The British are feeling the pinch in relation to recent bombings and have raised their security level from "Miffed" to "Peeved". Soon, though, security levels may be raised yet again to "Irritated" or even "A Bit Cross". Londoners have not been "A Bit Cross" since the blitz in 1940 when tea supplies all but ran out. Terrorists have been re-categorised from "Tiresome" to a "Bloody Nuisance". The last time the British issued a "Bloody Nuisance" warning level was during the great fire of 1666.

Also, the French government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror alert level from "Run" to "Hide". The only two higher levels in France are "Surrender" and "Collaborate". The rise was precipitated by a recent fire that destroyed France's white flag factory, effectively paralysing the country's military capability.

It's not only the British and French that are on a heightened level of alert. Italy has increased the alert level from "Shout Loudly and Excitedly" to "Elaborate Military Posturing". Two more levels remain: "Ineffective Combat Operations" and "Change Sides".

The Germans also increased their alert state from "Disdainful Arrogance" to "Dress in Uniform and Sing Marching Songs". They also have two higher levels: "Invade Several Neighbouring Countries" and "Lose".

The Belgians, on the other hand, are all on holiday as usual, and the only threat they are worried about is NATO pulling out of Brussels.

Meanwhile in Edinburgh, the devolved SNP Government has also been forced to respond. After initially declaring that it could not do anything because it lacked the full portfolio of policy levers available to an independent state, it has now declared that it has delegated the matter to its local councils via a "Historic Concordat" which does not actually commit them to do anything, but serves the purpose of deflecting any blame away from the SNP.

Well-placed sources indicate that more robust measures have been discussed, but these depend on funding being available from something called the "SFT", which unfortunately does not exist.

The same sources indicate that in the last resort, First Minister Salmond will communicate directly with any terrorists, blaming their grievances on the English and quisling, traitorous, lickspittle Scottish unionists, and beg them to restrict their activities to south of the border."

Second part of Mythbusters Porn subject

Still off-topic: CVF porn

Enjoy pics of the future flagships of Her Britannic Majesty's Royal Navy.

Which will, of course, be substantially built in Scotland (some blocks on the Clyde, and final assembly at Rosyth), unless a certain idiotic separatist party gets its way and manages to destroy both a major Scottish industry and the integrated defence of the United Kingdom.

But it's not going to happen, so why worry?

LMAO at this post by the Mythbuster from Scotland

Off-topic: submarine porn

Now isn't the Astute seriously cool and sexy?

There are all sorts of features on that hull which make you want to sit down with the designer and ask "Why that?"

Except, of course, that all he could do would be to shrug and make slitting motions near his throat.

Creeping sort of back on-topic, it is of course highly gratifying that as part of the UK we will have babies like the Astute defending us. Not something an "independent" Scotland could afford by any stretch.

And, of course, the Astutes are a bit late and over-budget. This is because there was too much of a gap between the last order for the Vanguard-class bombers and the first for the Astutes, which meant that the one yard in the country which can build subs (Barrow) suffered significant de-skilling.

Which leads on to further thoughts about Trident replacement. If this is cancelled or delayed, then we might find ourselves having to order extra Astute-class SSNs. Otherwise, Barrow will shut and the UK will lose, for ever and ever, the capability to build nuclear-powered subs. Which are literally in a different order-of-magnitude class of effectiveness from conventional diesel-electric boats.

This feeds in to the Trident-replacement debate, as you can see. A huge chunk of the apparent cost-saving from not replacing Trident disappears, unless you are also willing to see Barrow close and the loss of a UK SSN construction capability. It's not just about morals or costs, it affects industrial strategy.