Collaborate or Lose

Below is a post by my friend and True Patriot the Beacon, all Nationalist should read this message very carefully and think about it. I have been saying for a long time now that our situation a Nationalists is very similar to that of the Communists in 1920's/30's Germany when they saw the threat of the National Socialists led by Adolf Hitler, instead of banding together early in the game they were fragmented which basically left Germans with no one to vote for but Adolf Hitler, while we absolutely despise the communists we can take a very valuable lesson from 80 years ago. We must stop being talk shops and hiding in our own little groups complaining but doing nothing, we must band together in an alliance and , like the Beacon says we must put aside party differences and petty arguments and make sure there is a strong Nationalist candidate in each seat and all nationalist need to get behind that candidate. IF WE DON'T DO THIS THEN REMEMBER WHAT HAPPENED TO THOSE IN OPPOSITION 80 YEARS AGO IN GERMANY.

Biggles

British Nationalism

It looks more and more as April 2010 will be the date set for the general election. Labour can't afford to go in June taking the gamble they will prosper in the council elections to lead them to victory in the general. If they get a thrashing in May, and there is little evidence to show they won't, it will have to be April or May at best.

One slight worry is the nonsense being spun about a general election may spark riots. It has been suggested Brown may use that lie in order to declare a national emergency to postpone a general election. Conspiracy theory? Maybe.

The Nationalists in England are winning the argument and are definitely on the rise. We have to take our stand at this election for our own good. That means we have to stop party politics and petty arguments and support the Nationalist candidate regardless which party they stand for.

I'm not saying you have to give up your allegiance to your own party, you don't. What I am saying is give all the support you can to the Nationalist local to you. We have to use tactical measures to suit our cause.

This is not 1979 and Cameron is no Thatcher! We can take seats in Westminster if we really want to by concentrating on those who can win regardless which flag they fly under. In the end we all fly British flags be they Union or English.

I'm sure this plea of consolidation and co-operation will fall of deaf ears. Until those who call themselves nationalists put nationalism before party, we will continue to be kept put in the cold.

Beacon

And finally from my Scottish Friend a piece of brilliance

This is something which was almost, but after a bit of discussion and thought, not posted to Scottish Unionist's thread onSuppressed anti-Englishness.

Clearly it doesn't belong there, because that's turned into a serious and lengthy discussion, while this is just a bit of tongue-in-cheek hooliganism. Nonetheless, it does illustrate some of SU's points about the fairly unique nature of British national identity.

This isn't new - you'll have seen it knocking around before - but I've added a Scotland-specific coda.

For those who are offended all I'd like to say is: Hee!

"European Terror Alert Status Update

The British are feeling the pinch in relation to recent bombings and have raised their security level from "Miffed" to "Peeved". Soon, though, security levels may be raised yet again to "Irritated" or even "A Bit Cross". Londoners have not been "A Bit Cross" since the blitz in 1940 when tea supplies all but ran out. Terrorists have been re-categorised from "Tiresome" to a "Bloody Nuisance". The last time the British issued a "Bloody Nuisance" warning level was during the great fire of 1666.

Also, the French government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror alert level from "Run" to "Hide". The only two higher levels in France are "Surrender" and "Collaborate". The rise was precipitated by a recent fire that destroyed France's white flag factory, effectively paralysing the country's military capability.

It's not only the British and French that are on a heightened level of alert. Italy has increased the alert level from "Shout Loudly and Excitedly" to "Elaborate Military Posturing". Two more levels remain: "Ineffective Combat Operations" and "Change Sides".

The Germans also increased their alert state from "Disdainful Arrogance" to "Dress in Uniform and Sing Marching Songs". They also have two higher levels: "Invade Several Neighbouring Countries" and "Lose".

The Belgians, on the other hand, are all on holiday as usual, and the only threat they are worried about is NATO pulling out of Brussels.

Meanwhile in Edinburgh, the devolved SNP Government has also been forced to respond. After initially declaring that it could not do anything because it lacked the full portfolio of policy levers available to an independent state, it has now declared that it has delegated the matter to its local councils via a "Historic Concordat" which does not actually commit them to do anything, but serves the purpose of deflecting any blame away from the SNP.

Well-placed sources indicate that more robust measures have been discussed, but these depend on funding being available from something called the "SFT", which unfortunately does not exist.

The same sources indicate that in the last resort, First Minister Salmond will communicate directly with any terrorists, blaming their grievances on the English and quisling, traitorous, lickspittle Scottish unionists, and beg them to restrict their activities to south of the border."

Racism rears its ugly head in Scotland

The British National Party in Scotland has exposed Dumfries and Galloway Council for spending nearly a quarter of a million pounds on an ethnic organisation which bars white British people from becoming full members.

The shocking news was revealed by Dumfries and Galloway BNP organiser Ian Murphy in a press release after he obtained the figures following a Freedom of Information request.

“Almost £222,000 has been given to Dumfries and Galloway Multicultural Association which shows the lack of regard for Britain’s native population held at all levels of government,” said Mr Murphy.

“The whole thing reeks of hypocrisy and anti-British bias,” Mr Murphy continued. “At a time when our party is facing a government-inspired legal challenge to our indigenous membership criteria, we find out that £222,000 of taxpayers’ money has been given to an organisation whose constitution reserves membership for ethnic minorities.”

The information shows that over the past few years some £5,899 has been spent on citizenship ceremonies, £4,193 on telephone translation services and £13,650 on “diversity and equality awareness-related” training.

Mr Murphy added: “It’s disgusting that a quarter-million pounds of taxpayers’ money is being squandered on careless and wasteful politically correct spending in a region which has one of the smallest ethnic populations in the country.

“This region is also still in the middle of picking itself up from the wake of an economic body blow. Everyone here is engaged in a financial battle to stay alive, and the council is considering scrapping school meals because of financial constraints. But, it seems, they have money to spend on ethnic-only organisations.

“Frankly it’s a disgrace that the needs of alien minorities, who have paid less into the system, are put ahead of the welfare of our own children. This is just a portent of what is to follow for Britain’s next generation who are already treated like second class citizens in their own country,” he said.

This is a further example of multicuralism being racist towards the ethnic majority.

A Video for the Nation

I ask you to watch this video then think about what you are doing for your country.

Thanks again to Lionheart.

You Won't Catch Me I'm Part Of The Union

Unlike a few of my fellow Nationalists I despise and hate the Marxists and the SNP who want to break up the United Kingdom - contrary to what they say this would make all four Union Countries weaker and poorer in both our pockets and hearts, when ever a Scotsman and an Englishman argue it is a fight between two brothers and god help any foreign git that steps in to the fray (I personally have seen this happen once in Spain and the poor Spaniard was at a complete loss and couldn't understand how we could fight one moment and party together the next), we all take the mickey out of each other and we argue but when threatened we all come together as one big family which is only right as we are all of the same race.

The following is an extract from the blog Nationalist Mythbusting (a blog attacking the Marxist racist thugs that are the SNP

"Thursday, 13 August 2009

A cost of "independence"

For folks like me, aside from the facts that

(a) we don't want to turn the rest of the UK into a foreign country; and

(b) the numbers (now endorsed by the SNP) show that Scotland would be, at best, no better economically out of the Union than in it;

...one of the things that is bothersome is the inevitable and unnecessary costs of duplicating stuff that is currently done on a shared basis through the UK.

It occurred to me that it ought to be relatively easy to get a handle on the numbers for one aspect of this, namely diplomatic representation: embassies, consulates and the like.

Let us look at some facts.

As part of the UK, we are represented abroad by 261 embassies, high commissions, consulates and so on.

The total FCO budget seems to be around £1.7bn. So, very crudely, dividing one number by the other (and ignoring the fact that not all the costs are associated with the embassies and so on) the cost per overseas mission is £6.5m. Of which Scotland's share (at around 8.5%) is only £550k per mission, for a total of £144.5m.

For comparison, Ireland has only 75 missions abroad. Applying the same methodology, the Irish DFA costs €207m, or £178m - £2.6m per mission.

So, Irish embassies, consulates and so on are cheaper than British ones. Not surprising - not only will they be in less grand and expensive premises, but they will be more lightly staffed and less effective. After all, the smaller and more insignificant a country is, the less the rest of the world cares what it thinks - and so the less point there is in that country paying people to explain what it thinks!

The point is, of course, that Scotland currently gets representation by 261 missions abroad for £144.5m. An "independent" Scotland would, like Ireland, have to pay £34m more to achieve less than 30% of the representation it currently gets. (Oh I know, "independent" Scotland ought to be entitled to 8.5% of the embassy estate. This would no doubt be expressed as a cheque for the capital value, offset by the rental of a couple of portakabins in the embassy grounds until the new Scottish diplomats found new digs.)

Now these are only small numbers, but they are illustrative. Multiply these sort of effects across the health, education and social security systems and suddenly you're into billions. And as the saying goes, "A billion here and a billion there, and before you know it you're talking real money."

Divorce is an expensive business."

The truth of the whole fiasco is that we have a disenfranchised republican minority in Scotland that could not give a monkey's about the state that Scotland would be in if it left the union, these are the same people that never spoke out against Scottish Watch (an organisation set up to terrorise anyone not Scottish and to do anything literally to keep Scotland ethnically clean) and are so anti English that they snub the Queen when on state visits (and yet they call The BNP racist lol).

So a message to all my fellow nationalists "Together we are strong - apart we are nothing".